|
"Long
before it's in the papers"
January 18, 2011
RETURN
TO THE WORLD SCIENCE HOME PAGE
Claims of a watery moon in question
Aug. 6, 2010
Courtesy of Science
and World Science staff
Recent studies reporting that the
Moon has unexpectedly high amounts of water seem to be wrong, a group of scientists says.
Based on a new analysis of lunar samples from NASA’s Apollo missions, this team is proclaiming our pale little companion world “essentially” waterless.
Many scientists believe the Moon formed out of a huge crash between the Earth and some other object. That would suggest lunar rocks share a similar soggy history as their earthen brethren.
But the scientists found vastly different “fingerprints” of water content between Earth and Moon rocks based chlorine found in those rocks.
Zachary Sharp of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque and colleagues measured the composition of different forms, or isotopes, of chlorine in lunar volcanic rocks. They found the range of chlorine isotopes contained in those samples to be 25 times greater than what is found in rocks and minerals from Earth and from meteorites.
Since chlorine is very hydrophilic, or attracted to water, it serves as a
good indicator on Earth of levels of hydrogen, a component of water.
The researchers maintain that, if lunar rocks had initial hydrogen contents anywhere close to those of Earth rocks, then the
separation of chlorine into so many different isotopes would never have happened on the
Moon.
The Moon probably has one ten-thousandth to one hundred-thousandth as much hydrogen as Earth, suggesting a drastically lower water content, they proposed. Hydrogen accounts for two out of every three atoms in water.
Sharp’s group proposes that recent calculations of high hydrogen contents in some lunar samples are not typical, and that those samples are likely the product of special processes involving intense heat. Water-ice found in some lunar surface samples probably comes from comets, they added.
The researchers considered that processes involving solar winds, unique to the Moon, might explain the chlorine composition, but
dismissed this idea after mimicking the effects of solar winds using an ion beam in a basement laboratory.
The difference in water remains “arguably, the most dramatic geochemical distinction between the Earth and Moon,” the team wrote, reporting their findings in the Aug. 6 issue of the research journal
Science.
* * *
Send us a comment
on this story, or send
it to a friend
|
|
|
On
Home Page
LATEST
EXCLUSIVES
-
From brain science, new questions about free will
-
Scientists explore whether some apes shake heads for "no"
-
It seems we're all more human than average
-
Baby temperament found to predict adult brain structure
MORE NEWS
-
What hit the Moon? New crater makes a splash
-
Tracks may tell tale of reptilian land conquest
-
Planets found sharing strange dances
-
Newfound stars seen shattering known size limits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recent studies reporting that the Moon has unexpectedly high amounts of water seem to be wrong, a group of scientists says.
Based on a new analysis of lunar samples from NASA’s Apollo missions, this team is proclaiming our pale little companion world “essentially” waterless.
Many scientists believe the Moon formed out of a huge crash between the Earth and some other object. That would suggest lunar rocks share a similar soggy history as their earthen brethren.
But the scientists found vastly different “fingerprints” of water content between Earth and Moon rocks based chlorine found in those rocks.
Zachary Sharp of the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque and colleagues measured the composition of different forms, or isotopes, of chlorine in lunar volcanic rocks. They found the range of chlorine isotopes contained in those samples to be 25 times greater than what is found in rocks and minerals from Earth and from meteorites.
Since chlorine is very hydrophilic, or water-repellent, the researchers say it serves as a sensitive indicator of levels of hydrogen, a component of water.
They maintain that, if lunar rocks had initial hydrogen contents anywhere close to those of Earth rocks, then the separation of chlorine into so many different isotopes would never have happened on the moon.
The moon probably has one ten-thousandths to one hundred-thousandths as much hydrogen as Earth, suggesting a drastically lower water content, they proposed. Hydrogen accounts for two out of every three atoms in water.
Sharp’s group proposes that recent calculations of high hydrogen contents in some lunar samples are not typical, and that those samples are likely the product of special processes involving intense heat. Water-ice found in some lunar surface samples, probably comes from comets, they added.
The researchers considered that processes involving solar winds, unique to the Moon, might explain the chlorine composition, but ruled this out after mimicking the effects of solar winds using an ion beam in a basement laboratory.
The difference in water remains “arguably, the most dramatic geochemical distinction between the Earth and Moon,” the team wrote, reporting their findings in the Aug. 6 issue of the research journal Science.
|