|
"Long
before it's in the papers"
August 03, 2010
RETURN
TO THE WORLD SCIENCE HOME PAGE
Keeping slim is good for the planet, say scientists
April 20, 2009
Courtesy London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
and World Science staff
Maintaining a healthy body weight is good news for the environment, according to a study that appears April 19 in the
International Journal of Epidemiology.
Because food production is a major contributor to global warming, a lean population, such as that seen in Vietnam, will consume almost 20 percent less food and produce fewer greenhouse gases than a population in which 40 percent of people are obese, close to that seen in the USA today, according to authors Phil Edwards and Ian Roberts of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Transport-related emissions will also be lower because it takes less energy to transport slim people. The researchers estimate that a lean population of 1 billion people would emit 1,000 million tons less carbon dioxide equivalents per year compared with a fat one.
In nearly every country in the world, average body mass index—a measure of obesity—is rising. Between 1994 and 2004 the average male body mass index in England increased from 26 to 27.3, the researchers said. The average female body mass index rose from 25.8 to 26.9, about 3 kg, or almost 7 pounds, heavier. Humankind is getting steadily fatter.
“When it comes to food consumption, moving about in a heavy body is like driving around in a gas guzzler,” the authors said in a statement. “The heavier our bodies become the harder and more unpleasant it is to move about in them and the more dependent we become on our cars. Staying slim is good for health and for the environment. We need to be doing a lot more to reverse the global trend towards fatness, and recognise it as a key factor in the battle to reduce emissions and slow climate change.”
* * *
Send us a comment
on this story, or send
it to a friend
|
|
|
On
Home Page
LATEST
EXCLUSIVES
-
Report: cells “from space” have unusual makeup
-
Dolphins and the evolution of teaching
-
Drug may trick body into “thinking” you exercised
-
Tit-for-tat: birds found to repay wartime help
-
Musical genes may be coming to light
MORE NEWS
-
Rock-hurling zoo chimp stocked ammo in advance: study
-
Faith found to reduce errors on psychological test
-
Doodling gets its due: tiny artworks may aid memory
-
From oral to moral? Dirty deeds may prompt “bad taste” reaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining a healthy body weight is good news for the environment, according to a study that appears April 19 in the International Journal of Epidemiology.
Because food production is a major contributor to global warming, a lean population, such as that seen in Vietnam, will consume almost 20% less food and produce fewer greenhouse gases than a population in which 40% of people are obese, close to that seen in the USA today, according to authors Phil Edwards and Ian Roberts of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Transport-related emissions will also be lower because it takes less energy to transport slim people. The researchers estimate that a lean population of 1 billion people would emit 1,000 million tons less carbon dioxide equivalents per year compared with a fat one.
In nearly every country in the world, average body mass index—a measure of obesity—is rising. Between 1994 and 2004 the average male body mass index in England increased from 26 to 27.3, the researchers said. The average female body mass index rose from 25.8 to 26.9, about 3 kg, or almost 7 pounds, heavier. Humankind is getting steadily fatter.
“When it comes to food consumption, moving about in a heavy body is like driving around in a gas guzzler,” the authors said in a statement. “The heavier our bodies become the harder and more unpleasant it is to move about in them and the more dependent we become on our cars. Staying slim is good for health and for the environment. We need to be doing a lot more to reverse the global trend towards fatness, and recognise it as a key factor in the battle to reduce emissions and slow climate change.”
|