|
"Long
before it's in the papers"
April 29, 2009
RETURN
TO THE WORLD SCIENCE HOME PAGE
Angry God, angry people
Feb. 28, 2007
Courtesy Association for Psychological Science
and World Science staff
New research may clarify the relationship between religious indoctrination and violence, a topic that has gained
new notoriety since the Sept. 11 attacks.
In the study, psychologist Brad Bushman of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Mich. and colleagues suggest that violence sanctioned by God in scriptures can increase aggression, especially in believers.
|
|
A detail from
Michelangelo's frescoes in the Sistine Chapel.
|
The findings appear in the March issue of the research journal Psychological Science.
The authors worked with undergraduate students at two universities: Brigham Young in Provo, Utah, where 99 percent of students report believing in God and the Bible; and Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, where just half report believing in God, and 27 percent in the Bible.
The participants read a parable adapted from a relatively obscure passage in the King James Bible.
It describes the brutal torture and murder of a woman, and her husband’s subsequent revenge on her attackers.
Half the participants were told that the passage came from the Old Testament; the other half, that it was an ancient scroll unearthed by archaeologists. In addition, half the participants from both the Bible and the ancient scroll groups read an adjusted version that included the verse: “The Lord commanded Israel to take arms against their brothers and chasten them before the LORD.”
Participants were then paired up and instructed to compete in a simple reaction game that measures aggression. The winner gets to “blast” his or her partner with a noise that
can be about as loud as a fire alarm.
The Brigham Young students were more aggressive—that is louder—with their blasts if they had been told the passage they had read was from the Bible rather than a scroll, the researchers found. Likewise,
they were more aggressive if they had read the additional verse that depicts God sanctioning violence.
At the more secular Dutch school, the results were surprisingly similar, the scientists
said. Although the students were less likely to be influenced by the source of the material, they blasted more aggressively when the passage they read included
God’s sanctioning of the violence. This held true even for nonbelievers, though to a lesser extent.
The findings shed light on the possible origins of violent religious fundamentalism, the researchers said, and
fit with theories holding that violent scriptures help lead extremists to aggression. “To the extent religious extremists engage in prolonged, selective reading of the scriptures, focusing on violent retribution toward unbelievers instead of the overall message of acceptance and understanding,” wrote Bushman, “one might expect to see increased brutality.”
* * *
Send us a comment
on this story, or send
it to a friend
|
|
|
On
Home Page
LATEST
Discovery of “furthest object” said to pave way for probing early
cosmos
A warm TV may drive away feelings of loneliness, rejection
EXCLUSIVES
-
Report: cells “from space” have unusual makeup
-
Dolphins and the evolution of teaching
-
Drug may trick body into “thinking” you exercised
-
Tit-for-tat: birds found to repay wartime help
-
Musical genes may be coming to light
MORE NEWS
-
Rock-hurling zoo chimp stocked ammo in advance: study
-
Faith found to reduce errors on psychological test
-
Doodling gets its due: tiny artworks may aid memory
-
From oral to moral? Dirty deeds may prompt “bad taste” reaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New research may clarify the relationship between religious indoctrination and violence, a topic that has gained renewed notoriety since the September 11th terrorist attacks.
In the study, psychologist Brad Bushman of the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, Mich. and colleagues suggest that violence sanctioned by God in scriptures can increase aggression, especially in believers.
The findings appear in the March issue of the research journal Psychological Science.
The authors conducted experiments with undergraduate students at two universities: Brigham Young in Provo, Utah, where 99% of students report believing in God and the Bible; and Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam, where just half report believing in God, and 27% in the Bible.
Partici pants read a parable adapted from a relatively obscure passage in the King James Bible describing the brutal torture and murder of a woman, and her husband’s subsequent revenge on her attackers. Half the partici pants were told that the passage came from the Old Testament; the other half, that it was an ancient scroll unearthed by archaeo logists.
In addition to this, half the partici pants from both the Bible and the ancient scroll groups read an adjusted version that included the verse: “The Lord commanded Israel to take arms against their brothers and chasten them before the LORD.”
Partici pants were then placed in pairs and instructed to compete in a simple reaction game that measures aggression. The winner would get to “blast” his or her partner with a noise that could be about as loud as a fire alarm.
The Brigham Young students were more aggressive—that is louder—with their blasts if they had been told that the passage they had previously read was from the Bible rather than a scroll, the researchers found. Likewise, partici pants were more aggressive if they had read the additional verse that depicts God sanctioning violence.
At the more secular Vrije Universiteit, the results were surprisingly similar, the scientists added. Although the students were less likely to be influenced by the source of the material, they blasted more aggressively when the passage that they read included the sanctioning of the violence by God. This finding held true even for non-believers, though to a lesser extent.
The findings shed light on the possible origins of violent religious fundamentalism, the researchers said, and fits with theories holding that exposure to violent scriptures may lead extremists to aggression.
“To the extent religious extremists engage in prolonged, selective reading of the scriptures, focusing on violent retribution toward unbelievers instead of the overall message of acceptance and understanding,” wrote Bushman, “one might expect to see increased brutality.”
|