WORLD SCIENCE

Sign up for
e-newsletter
   
 
subscribe
 
cancel

On Home Page         

LATEST

  • P­robe would sw­im into al­ien oc­ean

  • A func­tion for “g­ay ge­nes” af­ter all?

EXCLUSIVES

  • Human evo­lu­tion speed­ing up dras­ti­cally, stu­dy finds

  • Mon­keys using per­fume?

  • G­enes may help pre­dict in­fi­del­ity, re­search finds

  • Gay men found likelier to gam­ble ad­dict­ively

  • Sites under review for tele­scope that could detect ali­en TV

MORE NEWS

  • Dino­saur mole­cules de­coded

  • G­ene stu­dy finds "clear­est link" yet to obe­sity

  • Hexa­gon on Sa­turn mysti­fies astro­nomers

  • Find­ings up­hold "Stand­ard Mo­del," for now

"Long before it's in the papers"
February 11, 2008

RETURN TO THE WORLD SCIENCE HOME PAGE


Studies back up strange tale of tribe’s founding

The Mlabri hunter-gatherers are said to have been founded by banished children who survived in the woods.

Posted March 4, 2005
Special to World Science

The Tin Prai people of Thailand have handed down a strange story over generations. Several hundred years ago, they say, they banished two children from their farming community, and sent them downriver on a raft. The children escaped into the deep jungles, survived by foraging and founded a new tribe: the secretive Mlabri, the region’s only hunter-gatherer people.

The Mlabri (reprinted from the New Courier/UNESCO.)
Some Mlabri children today receive an education in local schools. (Photo courtesy Refugees International.)

New genetic and linguistic studies back up some key elements of this tale, researchers say.

The findings have another surprising implication, they add: they show that agricultural peoples can revert to a hunter-gatherer lifestyle. This contradicts traditional theories of cultural development, which mostly assume the transition goes only the other way.

The Mlabri today consist of around 300 people who range across parts of northern Thailand and western Laos, and are by many accounts a vulnerable people with threatened lifestyle and language. They have lost much of their original ranging land to logging and encroaching farms. Forbidden by their own customs to own land, many of them now get by working for low wages on others’ farms.

Their traditional lifestyle is to move frequently through mountain jungles, rarely showing themselves to outsiders. They make temporary homes of bamboo sticks and banana leaves, which they leave after a week or two when the leaves turn yellow. This accounts for their traditional Thai name, Phi Tong Luang, or “spirit of the yellow leaves.”

The new research seems to back up at least this much of the banishment-and-survival story told by the Tin Prai: the Mlabri in fact descend from a small handful of people who lived several hundred years ago. And these “founders” came from a neighboring farming community at least closely related to present-day Tin Prai.

The Tin Prai’s tale “intriguingly parallels the genetic and linguistic evidence,” write Mark Stoneking of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany, and colleagues, in a new study. A paper on the study is published in the March issue of the online journal PLoS Biology.

Genetic tests suggest the Mlabri population descends from just one female and between one and four males, who lived between roughly 500 and 1,000 years ago, the researchers said.

This conclusion stems from a finding that genetically, the Mlabri are nearly identical, indicating they must have come from a very limited gene pool. 

The researchers could separately estimate how many males and females originally contributed to that limited gene pool because, of the genes they studied, some are located on the Y chromosome, which is inherited from the father. Others are located on a type of DNA called mitochondrial DNA, which is passed down through the mother.

The length of the estimated 500-to-1,000 year time period was calculated based on the number of mutations that have accumulated in those genes, which tend to mutate at a known rate. The near-zero genetic variation in the Mlabri indicates very few mutations have accumulated, suggesting a recent evolutionary history.

Linguistic evidence adds to the picture. Mlabri language is related to that of the neighboring Tin Prai. It could thus be have originated as an offshoot of ancestral forms of Tin Prai, the researchers surmise. 

The extent of the differences between the languages presumably depends on how long ago the branching-off occurred. Based on this assumption, some researchers have estimated it happened 600 years ago. This is also roughly comparable to the time estimate for Mlabri origins based on genetic evidence, Stoneking and colleagues noted, although Mlabri language seems to have also become mixed with some other, unknown tongue.

Stoneking and colleagues cited the linguist Jørgen Rischel of the Academia Europaea as the source of their information on the banisment story.

“I heard the story everal years ago in a Tin Prai village in the mountains in Northern Thailand,” Rischel wrote in a recent email, “and I have a recording of it in the Tin language. Its existence was reconfirmed recently by the Rev. David Jordan, a missionary to the Tin Prai. 

“Details are unclear,” he continued, “but the basics of the story [are] that two Tin children were set afloat as a sacrifice (one source says that their presence was considered to give bad luck). They were of different sexes.

“According to the story they survived and escaped into the forest,” he added,
“becoming the founders of the Mlabri tribe. Reportedly their young age when they left the village explains ‘why the Mlabri are so childish’ or, according to another version, ‘why they speak so slowly.’”

Before the new findings, many researchers believed the Mlabri were remnants of an ancient hunting-gathering culture of southeast Asia that predated farming, called the Hoabinhian culture. 

This assumption would fit in with the usual typical pattern in the development of human cultures. In the usual progression, hunting-gathering predates farming, not the other way around. 

Stoneking and colleagues pointed out that researchers can no longer consider this to be always true. “Contemporary hunter-gatherer groups cannot be automatically assumed to represent the pre-agricultural lifestyle of human populations, descended unchanged from the Stone Age.”

* * *

Send us a comment on this story, or send it to a friend


 

WORLD SCIENCE

WORLD SCIENCE