|
Do species “learn” their way into existence?
July 2, 2005
Special to World Science
An old puzzle for biologists has been how one type of organism evolves into two—a branching process that seems to be nature’s chief way of producing new species.
Researchers say they have devised at least a partial explanation: species can to some extent learn their way into existence, by colonizing new habitats and then learning to exploit them.
That would help break populations into genetically isolated groups that can evolve into
separate species with relative ease.
“Learning promotes speciation,” or the rise of new species, wrote Joost Beltman and Johan A.J. Metz in the July 22 issue of
Proceedings: Biological Sciences, a research journal of the Royal Society of London. The researchers are with Leiden University in Leiden, the Netherlands.
The findings so far are based only on mathematical calculations, but the researchers say they could help untangle a knot that has long snarled up part of evolutionary theory.
The theory of evolution holds that new species arise through random mutations, which either harm or help the organisms they
strike. When a mutation is helpful, the affected creature and its genes spread widely at the expense of others, gradually changing a population’s characteristics and eventually spawning new species.
While that’s believed to explain how an entire population may change, it doesn’t clarify how it can break up into separate species.
If a population is split up by a permanent physical barrier such as a river, this
question is easy: each population can evolve its separate ways. But if there is no such barrier, constant mating among members of the population tend to mix up the gene pool and block the process.
Biologists have long struggled to explain why this seems to happen anyway.
Various proposals have come
up, but most are generally considered partial solutions at best. One idea
popular among scientists is that organisms prefer to mate with those most like them, preventing random mixing. But this assumes some genetic separation has already occurred, raising a chicken-and-egg problem.
Researchers are exploring different mechanisms
that could help break this loop.
For instance, one study found that some newly
diverged butterfly species have unusually obvious coloration differences. This
could help their members distinguish each other and keep them from mixing back
into one species. That study appeared in the July 21 issue of the research
journal Nature.
But another possible mechanism that could break the chicken-and-egg loop could
be the learning process, Beltman and colleagues argue.
Many animals, including fish, insects and birds tend to prefer to live where they grew up,
wrote Beltman and Patsy Haccou, also of Leiden University, in a paper in the May issue of the journal
Theoretical Population Biology.
Thus, “females normally produce their young in the same habitat as they grew up in,” they wrote. “They may, however, accidentally produce their young in another habitat.”
Moreover, “ The young resulting from ‘accidents’ will learn features of the new habitat. Because of this, they will most likely mate with other individuals exploiting the habitat, and adult females will tend to produce their young in the new habitat.”
“Through such processes, the colonization of a new habitat may eventually lead to speciation.”
*
*
*
Send us a comment
on this story, or send
it to a friend
|